Dai Lun wrote:
When I brought this up to the seller, he remarked that the set was
considered Type II if any of the coins were Type II.

I think that's a ridiculous definition. For a set to be considered a
"Type II Set", *all* coins must be Type II. Similarly, a "Type I Set"
would have all Type I coins. Anything with mixed types would just be a
year set, with no regard to typeness.

--
Bob