View Single Post
  #25  
Old April 13th 04, 07:56 PM
MindElec
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:53:51 GMT, Cathy Krusberg
declared:

palmer.william wrote:

Mr. or Ms. Internet Bookseller, you will either
describe your listings in grammatical English
using the standard terms of the trade or you
will not get my business.

(And as to the book buyers, well, if you are dumb
enough to buy on line from so-called booksellers who
don't know their basic terminology--and exhibit
an atrocious lack of writing skills too--Ebay is not
going to be able to save you from yourself.)


Although I basically agree with this, I'd like to add
one caveat: That the seller can suffer when s/he
uses standard terms correctly and the buyer does not.
I've seen negative feedback resulting from a book's
condition being described as "good" (in the trade standard
sense) but not being up to the buyer's idea of "good" (in
a more colloquial sense). Sometimes you can't win.


a book dealer describing a book as "good" really Really should have
more of a description than that. "good" along with a laundry list of
flaws should make the true condition apparent.



Robert

--

The sound of gunfire, off in the distance, I'm getting used to it now
Lived in a brownstone, lived in the ghetto, I've lived all over this town
This ain't no party, this ain't no disco, this ain't no fooling around
Ads