? "Sir F.A. Rien" ?????? ??? ??????
...
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:27:52 +0300, "gogu"
sharpened a crayon and wrote:

There is a seller advertising a Mini Sheet which comprises 6 stamps in it.
In the item description he says it's MNH but there are post office seals
placed over the 6 stamps!
Sure, the post office seals look very odonate and look like they are
placed
by a machine and not by hand.
But they are still seals on the stamps...
My question is if the MNH representation for this set is misguiding or
not?
Is this set considered "used" or not?


NOT ... unless you don't count CTO as 'Mint".

I don't know how to "count" it, that's why I'm asking for your expert
opinion:-)

NH applies only to whether it is hinged or not.

I see...
So you are saying that a CTO stamp/set can be described as MNH, too.

'Mint' is 'as issued' - so the 'pre-cancel' or 'Cancelled to Order' is
a variant, though most prefer to place the CTO well below 'postally
used'.

Thanks!
So if for many, the CTO are considered inferior to used, I suppose you
suggest to let this CTO set go and go for the MNH...

--

E' mai possibile, oh porco di un cane, che le avventure
in codesto reame debban risolversi tutte con grandi
puttane! F.d.A

Coins, travels and mo
http://s208.photobucket.com/albums/bb120/golanule/
http://gogu.enosi.org/index.html