OOPS, now I sound like Golum. One of my rules of art is "nothing is precious",
certainly not my "previous" post.
toma spellcheck

Tom Loepp wrote:

Victor et al,
Thanks Victor for your comparison.
I like, as do others, the scanned page. It has the "work of art" feeling that
I was yacking about. The composed page loaded in a few seconds and the scanned
took over 10 seconds. So, in a precious post I have proposed that there are no
rules and entrants can go either way. This leaves it up to the designer. You
will note that many people will see something different with the composed page,
a real shocker when I first saw my website on a pc.
Tom

Victor Manta wrote:

Because the inquiring minds want to know :-) , I have decided to verify the
whole thing on a real case.

So I have scanned an existing album page, at 100 dpi (!), and I have then
composed the same page from scratch. In the composed page I have used the
same images as those displayed by the scanned one, by simply extracting them
from it.

Up to you to judge the results.

The scanned page is at:
http://www.values.ch/Temp/resolution1.htm

and the composed one is at:
http://www.values.ch/Temp/resolution.htm

Victor Manta



--
Thomas Loepp

Email:
Website: http://loepp.home.mindspring.com/tom/