erratum: "pea brain" substituted for "mullet-head"

"fundoc" wrote in message
...

"michael adams" wrote in message
...

"fundoc" wrote in message
...

But is it hypocritical enough to where I get to get a rise
out of Yamamoto each and every time I kick him for doing it?
Evidently it is.


Where you may have had a point, is that a post containing
the bare exhortation combined with a sig could certainly
be interpreted as being either hypocritical and or grossly
ironical, by any spamming newbie who was unaware of John's
substantive contributions to the NewsGroup. Which substantive
contributions legitimise the inclusion of a sig, according
to the terms of the FAQ, at least.

The inclusion of a sig in those circumstances could certainly
be interpreted in that way, by the very person to whom the
post was mainly addressed. But not by anyone else.

Unfortunately for you however, you never actually made that
point, did you ?

Oh dear. As usually happens when my little spanktards get
together for a circle jerk, you forgot to bring the cookie.

Allow me: http://tinyurl.com/amqwt



Unfortunately for you pea-brain, your little joke sort of
misfired. Given that "Sterno" is largely unknown in the UK.
To the intended recipient at least.

Having to look up trade names, sort of lessens the impact!

As I said to you previously, lard brain "so near and yet so far".

Hoot!



michael adams

....