Honestly, I personally don't see a problem with it. As you know,
you're getting the autograph for you, first and foremost. Get the
autographs that make you happy. If you ever do sell the item, the
person will most likely buy it based on one of the autographs. If the
person isn't interested because it's multi-signed, there's always
another potential buyer somewhere down the road that won't be as
picky. :-)

--


Mike
Gummby3
-= Star Collector =-
www.star-collector.net
Celebrity addresses the way they should be - free.


"Sue H" wrote in message
...
I was wondering about what would ruin a value of a baseball.

I got an official ball signed by Bill Buckner and then today I
almost
brought it and got Lee Smith to sign it as they played together
briefly (I think one season).

What constitues a better thing: two separate balls, a ball with
players all from the same team (and do they have to be same year(s),
Or is it bad to get someone of lesser known status on a ball with
someone of a more major status?

I ended up not bringing the ball as I thought perhaps Buckner was
best
left on that alone (unless I can get a couple major names from the
year the ball went between his legs). Thoughts?

My question makes me wonder about music graphs too. So say I got
some
70's-80's band signatures but later on they have new band members.
If
I had say a generic item like a pickguard or drum head, would it be
good to get the other sigs, or leave it to the ORIGINAL members? I
would think getting a CD or photo signed which a new member was not
part of would not be cool, but not sure about more generic things.
Opinion?