|
More valuable than I knew
|
Alan & Erin Williams wrote:
Is this coin: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=3900190 441 Alan '168 x and rising' Wow! Someone REALLY wants that quarter, don't they? I had no idea that such a coin commanded such a price! Larry 'surprises are out there' |
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:01:57 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams
is alleged to have written: Is this coin: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=3900190 441 Alan '168 x and rising' I know that some clad quarters are REALLY difficult to find nice. nobody saved them, few rolls were put back, most all of the nice specimens come from mint sets. Maybe the 83-D is one of the ones where even the mint sets looked ugly. I got a couple of mint sets like that, where the quarter and the dime are just plain crappy. Bruce |
Bruce Hickmott wrote:
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:01:57 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams is alleged to have written: Is this coin: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=3900190 441 Alan '168 x and rising' I know that some clad quarters are REALLY difficult to find nice. nobody saved them, few rolls were put back, most all of the nice specimens come from mint sets. Maybe the 83-D is one of the ones where even the mint sets looked ugly. I got a couple of mint sets like that, where the quarter and the dime are just plain crappy. Bruce I think the biggest thing working for this slab is that no Mint Sets were issued that year. ;-) I'm just a little surprised that 20 years on, it's been decided that an MS-65 is worth more than 168x face.... Alan '617,806,446' |
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:44:47 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams
is alleged to have written: Bruce Hickmott wrote: On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:01:57 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams is alleged to have written: Is this coin: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=3900190 441 Alan '168 x and rising' I know that some clad quarters are REALLY difficult to find nice. nobody saved them, few rolls were put back, most all of the nice specimens come from mint sets. Maybe the 83-D is one of the ones where even the mint sets looked ugly. I got a couple of mint sets like that, where the quarter and the dime are just plain crappy. Bruce I think the biggest thing working for this slab is that no Mint Sets were issued that year. ;-) I'm just a little surprised that 20 years on, it's been decided that an MS-65 is worth more than 168x face.... Alan '617,806,446' If there were no mint sets that year, that coin might well be a bargain. Try to find one nicer! Bruce |
Bruce Hickmott wrote in
: On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:44:47 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams is alleged to have written: Bruce Hickmott wrote: On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:01:57 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams is alleged to have written: Is this coin: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...ory=39463&item =3900190441 Alan '168 x and rising' I know that some clad quarters are REALLY difficult to find nice. nobody saved them, few rolls were put back, most all of the nice specimens come from mint sets. Maybe the 83-D is one of the ones where even the mint sets looked ugly. I got a couple of mint sets like that, where the quarter and the dime are just plain crappy. Bruce I think the biggest thing working for this slab is that no Mint Sets were issued that year. ;-) I'm just a little surprised that 20 years on, it's been decided that an MS-65 is worth more than 168x face.... Alan '617,806,446' If there were no mint sets that year, that coin might well be a bargain. Try to find one nicer! Bruce pcgs.com is listing that coin at $10.00. The auction currently sits at $56.83! Maybe it's a bargain - maybe not. You guys can have it. -- Eric Babula Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA |
Bruce Hickmott wrote:
Maybe the 83-D is one of the ones where even the mint sets looked ugly. I got a couple of mint sets like that, where the quarter and the dime are just plain crappy. Bruce....there were no Mint Sets in 1982 or 1983. Souvenir sets from those years usually do pretty well on eBay. ++++++++++ Phil DeMayo - always here for my fellow Stooge When bidding online always sit on your helmet Just say NO to counterfeits |
On 03 Mar 2004 14:14:19 GMT, Eric Babula is alleged to have
written: Bruce Hickmott wrote in : On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:44:47 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams is alleged to have written: Bruce Hickmott wrote: On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:01:57 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams is alleged to have written: Is this coin: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...ory=39463&item =3900190441 Alan '168 x and rising' I know that some clad quarters are REALLY difficult to find nice. nobody saved them, few rolls were put back, most all of the nice specimens come from mint sets. Maybe the 83-D is one of the ones where even the mint sets looked ugly. I got a couple of mint sets like that, where the quarter and the dime are just plain crappy. Bruce I think the biggest thing working for this slab is that no Mint Sets were issued that year. ;-) I'm just a little surprised that 20 years on, it's been decided that an MS-65 is worth more than 168x face.... Alan '617,806,446' If there were no mint sets that year, that coin might well be a bargain. Try to find one nicer! Bruce pcgs.com is listing that coin at $10.00. The auction currently sits at $56.83! Maybe it's a bargain - maybe not. there are a number of coins priced at PCGS.COM that I consider woefully underpriced. The market thinks so, too. Does this coin deserve to be one of the underpriced? Dunno. Only way to tell is to try to find a nicer one. Bruce |
|
Bruce Hickmott wrote in
: On 03 Mar 2004 14:14:19 GMT, Eric Babula is alleged to have written: Bruce Hickmott wrote in m: On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:44:47 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams is alleged to have written: Bruce Hickmott wrote: On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:01:57 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams is alleged to have written: Is this coin: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...egory=39463&it em =3900190441 Alan '168 x and rising' I know that some clad quarters are REALLY difficult to find nice. nobody saved them, few rolls were put back, most all of the nice specimens come from mint sets. Maybe the 83-D is one of the ones where even the mint sets looked ugly. I got a couple of mint sets like that, where the quarter and the dime are just plain crappy. Bruce I think the biggest thing working for this slab is that no Mint Sets were issued that year. ;-) I'm just a little surprised that 20 years on, it's been decided that an MS-65 is worth more than 168x face.... Alan '617,806,446' If there were no mint sets that year, that coin might well be a bargain. Try to find one nicer! Bruce pcgs.com is listing that coin at $10.00. The auction currently sits at $56.83! Maybe it's a bargain - maybe not. there are a number of coins priced at PCGS.COM that I consider woefully underpriced. The market thinks so, too. Does this coin deserve to be one of the underpriced? Dunno. Only way to tell is to try to find a nicer one. Bruce I agree that there are quite a few coins that are sleepers. I just wish I had a crystal ball, and could come up with that definite list, and start buying now! I hope, for the bidders' sake, that this is one of those cases! Otherwise, ouch! You stay away from my sleeper Morgans! ;-) -- Smile!! Eric Babula Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:02 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CollectingBanter.com