The First Art Stamp Ever?
Collectors of Art Stamps have often discussed which was the first art
topical stamp to be issued. Some say that this collecting area began with the French art series in the early 1960's, while others believe that it may be the French stamp from 1849 depicting Ceres, and yet others that it was the British Penny Black. In the bi-monthly publication "Topical Time" published by American Topical Association, #334/2005, Column "Topical Postline", appears a letter to the editor "--- sent an inquiry to American Philatelic Research Library, asking for the design source of France #1. The response states, "An explanation of the design appears in James Mackay's book "An Illustrated History of Stamp Design". France introduced stamps in January 1849, but instead of using the portrait of a living person, [they] chose the profile of Ceres, goddess of agriculture, in a circular frame with a rectangular border (Scott #1). The head of Ceres was taken from ancient Greek coins, a logical source of inspiration since coins and stamps were analogous in many respects". " --- I am not sure whether this qualifies as being the earliest use of art on stamps; I think this depends upon how one defines fine arts. The portrait on the 1840 British Penny Black (Scott #1) was based on "The Guildhall Medal of 1838" showing Wyon's profile of Queen Victoria. Might this not be considered to be fine arts?" What do other (art stamp) collectors think? -- Best regards Ann Mette Heindorff (Mette) http://arthistory.heindorffhus.dk ------ Outgoing messages.checked with Norton AV |
The First Art Stamp Ever?
Hi Mette,
every portrait on a stamp was made by an artist (painter, designer or what ever), so every stamp needs a blueprint. Designing stamps is an act of art. So the question should be specified, I think: If You define "art on stamps" as reproduction of an existing painting or sculpture to honore the artwork, then it is easy to look for the first stamp issue honoring an artist or his work. The Penny Black only honored Queen Victory as a living Majesty, not the artwork of the designer of the portrait. The same with the French Ceres. This picture was used as a symbol, not to reproduce an antique artwork. So in my humble opinion it is not an example for "art on stamps". Itīs a problem of definition, I think. Best regards Gerhard "amesh" schrieb im Newsbeitrag . .. Collectors of Art Stamps have often discussed which was the first art topical stamp to be issued. Some say that this collecting area began with the French art series in the early 1960's, while others believe that it may be the French stamp from 1849 depicting Ceres, and yet others that it was the British Penny Black. In the bi-monthly publication "Topical Time" published by American Topical Association, #334/2005, Column "Topical Postline", appears a letter to the editor "--- sent an inquiry to American Philatelic Research Library, asking for the design source of France #1. The response states, "An explanation of the design appears in James Mackay's book "An Illustrated History of Stamp Design". France introduced stamps in January 1849, but instead of using the portrait of a living person, [they] chose the profile of Ceres, goddess of agriculture, in a circular frame with a rectangular border (Scott #1). The head of Ceres was taken from ancient Greek coins, a logical source of inspiration since coins and stamps were analogous in many respects". " --- I am not sure whether this qualifies as being the earliest use of art on stamps; I think this depends upon how one defines fine arts. The portrait on the 1840 British Penny Black (Scott #1) was based on "The Guildhall Medal of 1838" showing Wyon's profile of Queen Victoria. Might this not be considered to be fine arts?" What do other (art stamp) collectors think? -- Best regards Ann Mette Heindorff (Mette) http://arthistory.heindorffhus.dk ------ Outgoing messages.checked with Norton AV |
The First Art Stamp Ever?
BTW, Wyon cast his name in the neck
but cannot be seen on the scan | Here is the Guildhall medal | http://cjoint.com/data/ljnroDtwht.htm |
The First Art Stamp Ever?
What about the Sardinian "Cavallini" impressed on letter sheets of 1819 to 1836 ? (riders with posthorn) -- rodney at touch88.com.au Send spam to the FTC at Thanks, robots. "amesh" wrote in message . .. | Collectors of Art Stamps have often discussed which was the first art | topical stamp to be issued. Some say that this collecting area began with | the French art series in the early 1960's, while others believe that it may | be the French stamp from 1849 depicting Ceres, and yet others that it was | the British Penny Black. | | In the bi-monthly publication "Topical Time" published by American Topical | Association, #334/2005, Column "Topical Postline", appears a letter to the | editor | | "--- sent an inquiry to American Philatelic Research Library, asking for the | design source of France #1. The response states, "An explanation of the | design appears in James Mackay's book "An Illustrated History of Stamp | Design". France introduced stamps in January 1849, but instead of using the | portrait of a living person, [they] chose the profile of Ceres, goddess of | agriculture, in a circular frame with a rectangular border (Scott #1). The | head of Ceres was taken from ancient Greek coins, a logical source of | inspiration since coins and stamps were analogous in many respects". | | " --- I am not sure whether this qualifies as being the earliest use of art | on stamps; I think this depends upon how one defines fine arts. The portrait | on the 1840 British Penny Black (Scott #1) was based on "The Guildhall Medal | of 1838" showing Wyon's profile of Queen Victoria. Might this not be | considered to be fine arts?" | | What do other (art stamp) collectors think? | -- | Best regards | Ann Mette Heindorff (Mette) | http://arthistory.heindorffhus.dk | ------ | Outgoing messages.checked with Norton AV | | | | | |
The First Art Stamp Ever?
"Gerhard Reichert" skrev i
en meddelelse ... Hi Mette, every portrait on a stamp was made by an artist (painter, designer or what ever), so every stamp needs a blueprint. Designing stamps is an act of art. So the question should be specified, I think: If You define "art on stamps" as reproduction of an existing painting or sculpture to honore the artwork, then it is easy to look for the first stamp issue honoring an artist or his work. The Penny Black only honored Queen Victory as a living Majesty, not the artwork of the designer of the portrait. The same with the French Ceres. This picture was used as a symbol, not to reproduce an antique artwork. So in my humble opinion it is not an example for "art on stamps". Itīs a problem of definition, I think. Hi Gerhard, Personally I think it is a question of definition. However, I could think of a third definition: an artwork especially designed for the stamp format, and which is not an already existing artwork reproduced on stamps. Such stamps do exist, but they are not many. Out of the hat I can think of one Hundertwasser-stamp, and 1-2 of the recent Danish art stamps. I would like to hear other opinions :-) Best regards Mette |
The First Art Stamp Ever?
"Rodney" skrev i en meddelelse
... What about the Sardinian "Cavallini" impressed on letter sheets of 1819 to 1836 ? (riders with posthorn) In my opinion they are just as symbolic as Queen Victoria and Ceres :-) Mette |
The First Art Stamp Ever?
"Rodney" skrev i en meddelelse
... Hiya Mette, Here is the Guildhall medal http://cjoint.com/data/ljnroDtwht.htm The jury is still out here, with a strong "no" to the portraits. Hej Rodney, Nice medal. She was quite attractive as young ... ;-) Mette |
The First Art Stamp Ever?
"amesh" wrote in message
. .. "Gerhard Reichert" skrev i en meddelelse ... Hi Mette, every portrait on a stamp was made by an artist (painter, designer or what ever), so every stamp needs a blueprint. Designing stamps is an act of art. So the question should be specified, I think: If You define "art on stamps" as reproduction of an existing painting or sculpture to honore the artwork, then it is easy to look for the first stamp issue honoring an artist or his work. The Penny Black only honored Queen Victory as a living Majesty, not the artwork of the designer of the portrait. The same with the French Ceres. This picture was used as a symbol, not to reproduce an antique artwork. So in my humble opinion it is not an example for "art on stamps". Itīs a problem of definition, I think. Hi Gerhard, Personally I think it is a question of definition. However, I could think of a third definition: an artwork especially designed for the stamp format, and which is not an already existing artwork reproduced on stamps. Such stamps do exist, but they are not many. Out of the hat I can think of one Hundertwasser-stamp, and 1-2 of the recent Danish art stamps. I would like to hear other opinions :-) Best regards Mette Both of you think that it's a problem or question of definition. IMHO, it's a matter of definition too. :-) An old Romanian romance says: ....Because there isn't a man who hasn't written a poem At least once, at least one, in his life. If it's true, than the image of every man is related to art, in the same manner as the image of Mark Twain on a stamp is related to literature. On a more serious note, I have limited the object of my Art on Stamps Site (link below) to: "... visual arts (painting, drawing, sculpting, pottery, tapestry, enamel, etc.) as they appear on stamps." I have included in the art on stamps database the stamps that meet the following criteria: a.. They should reproduce (pre-)existing works of art b.. They should show real works of art (as for example opposed to banal portraits, reproduced millions of times, like kings' or dictators' faces) The only exception I have made is for the works of art designed by renown artists, done with the purpose of being explicitly reproduced on stamps. http://www.values.ch/db-en.htm -- Victor Manta ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Art on Stamps: http://www.values.ch/ Spanish North Africa: http://www.values.ch/sna-site/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
The First Art Stamp Ever?
"Victor Manta" skrev i en meddelelse
... "amesh" wrote in message . .. "Gerhard Reichert" skrev i en meddelelse ... - snip - Both of you think that it's a problem or question of definition. IMHO, it's a matter of definition too. :-) An old Romanian romance says: ...Because there isn't a man who hasn't written a poem At least once, at least one, in his life. If it's true, than the image of every man is related to art, in the same manner as the image of Mark Twain on a stamp is related to literature. Yes, with the addition that literature is a part of art history in the sense that anyone whose works are read globally, are included. My personal poems would *never* qualify, I can assure you! :-) On a more serious note, I have limited the object of my Art on Stamps Site (link below) to: "... visual arts (painting, drawing, sculpting, pottery, tapestry, enamel, etc.) as they appear on stamps." I have included in the art on stamps database the stamps that meet the following criteria: A limitation that includes the rather vague "etc." ... ;-)) a.. They should reproduce (pre-)existing works of art In that case both the Guildhall-medal and the Ceres head qualify. b.. They should show real works of art (as for example opposed to banal portraits, reproduced millions of times, like kings' or dictators' faces) The only exception I have made is for the works of art designed by renown artists, done with the purpose of being explicitly reproduced on stamps. Thank you for your opinion. Mette |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CollectingBanter.com