Romantic fascinating girl can meet here in chat rooms
 

Romantic fascinating girl can meet here in chat rooms ******
http://UncleURL.com/416 ******

spam
 

"Sir F. A. Rien" wrote in message
...
*spammer* found these unused words:

*spam*

What are her perforations?


My ng server efficiently filters out this kind of spam. But our Sir F. A.
Rien brings it back, in the same time multiplying it, feeding the spammer
and making us "happy" with his own, special sense of humor that is
inappropriate for this ng.

--
Victor Manta, PWO, AIJP

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philatelic Webmasters Organization: http://pwmo.org/
Art on Stamps: http://artonstamps.org/
Romania by Stamps: http://marci-postale.com/
Communism on Stamps: http://reds-on.postalstamps.biz/
Spanish North Africa: http://www.sna-on.postalstamps.biz/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

spam
 

On 8/4/2011 1:05 PM, Victor Manta wrote:
"Sir F. A. wrote in message
...
*spammer* found these unused words:

*spam*

What are her perforations?


My ng server efficiently filters out this kind of spam. But our Sir F. A.
Rien brings it back, in the same time multiplying it, feeding the spammer
and making us "happy" with his own, special sense of humor that is
inappropriate for this ng.

Me too, Victor. My spam filter also deleted the original message; I only
saw Rien's reply. It's a stretch to compare "perforations" with
"measurements."

Bill

spam
 

On 8/5/2011 12:21, Billns wrote:
On 8/4/2011 1:05 PM, Victor Manta wrote:
"Sir F. A. wrote in message
...
*spammer* found these unused words:

*spam*

What are her perforations?


My ng server efficiently filters out this kind of spam. But our Sir F. A.
Rien brings it back, in the same time multiplying it, feeding the spammer
and making us "happy" with his own, special sense of humor that is
inappropriate for this ng.

Me too, Victor. My spam filter also deleted the original message; I only
saw Rien's reply. It's a stretch to compare "perforations" with
"measurements."

Bill

Well... Many of such similar spam messages I see are advertising, um,
an "imperforate" condition.

--
Don Levey, Framingam MA If knowledge is power,
(email address in header works) and power corrupts, then...
NOTE: Don't send mail to to
GnuPG public key: http://www.the-leveys.us:6080/keys/don-dsakey.asc

spam
 

"Don Levey" wrote in message
...
On 8/5/2011 12:21, Billns wrote:
On 8/4/2011 1:05 PM, Victor Manta wrote:
"Sir F. A. wrote in message
...
*spammer* found these unused words:

*spam*

What are her perforations?


My ng server efficiently filters out this kind of spam. But our Sir F.
A.
Rien brings it back, in the same time multiplying it, feeding the
spammer
and making us "happy" with his own, special sense of humor that is
inappropriate for this ng.

Me too, Victor. My spam filter also deleted the original message; I only
saw Rien's reply. It's a stretch to compare "perforations" with
"measurements."

Bill

Well... Many of such similar spam messages I see are advertising, um,
an "imperforate" condition.

Well, not in this context, on this ng.

Which reminds me the wise words of Mr. Jon Bell, the author of the RCSD
charter: "Since the continuation of the hobby requires that we involve
children and make them interested and comfortable as collectors, profanity
is prohibited (and is truly unnecessary for discussing stamps)."

http://www.pwmo.org/rcsd-charter-and-faq.htm

Victor Manta

spam
 

"Victor Manta" wrote in message
...
"Don Levey" wrote in message
...
On 8/5/2011 12:21, Billns wrote:
On 8/4/2011 1:05 PM, Victor Manta wrote:
"Sir F. A. wrote in message
...
*spammer* found these unused words:

*spam*

What are her perforations?


My ng server efficiently filters out this kind of spam. But our Sir F.
A.
Rien brings it back, in the same time multiplying it, feeding the
spammer
and making us "happy" with his own, special sense of humor that is
inappropriate for this ng.

Me too, Victor. My spam filter also deleted the original message; I only
saw Rien's reply. It's a stretch to compare "perforations" with
"measurements."

Bill

Well... Many of such similar spam messages I see are advertising, um,
an "imperforate" condition.

Well, not in this context, on this ng.

Which reminds me the wise words of Mr. Jon Bell, the author of the RCSD
charter: "Since the continuation of the hobby requires that we involve
children and make them interested and comfortable as collectors, profanity
is prohibited (and is truly unnecessary for discussing stamps)."

http://www.pwmo.org/rcsd-charter-and-faq.htm

Victor Manta



do children really read newsgroups???

Pedro

spam
 

"Pedro" wrote in message
...
"Victor Manta" wrote in message
...
"Don Levey" wrote in message
...
On 8/5/2011 12:21, Billns wrote:
On 8/4/2011 1:05 PM, Victor Manta wrote:
"Sir F. A. wrote in message
...
*spammer* found these unused words:

*spam*

What are her perforations?


My ng server efficiently filters out this kind of spam. But our Sir F.
A.
Rien brings it back, in the same time multiplying it, feeding the
spammer
and making us "happy" with his own, special sense of humor that is
inappropriate for this ng.

Me too, Victor. My spam filter also deleted the original message; I
only
saw Rien's reply. It's a stretch to compare "perforations" with
"measurements."

Bill

Well... Many of such similar spam messages I see are advertising, um,
an "imperforate" condition.

Well, not in this context, on this ng.

Which reminds me the wise words of Mr. Jon Bell, the author of the RCSD
charter: "Since the continuation of the hobby requires that we involve
children and make them interested and comfortable as collectors,
profanity is prohibited (and is truly unnecessary for discussing
stamps)."

http://www.pwmo.org/rcsd-charter-and-faq.htm

Victor Manta

do children really read newsgroups???

Pedro

I know that some children read them in the past. Anyway, even if it doesn't
happen often today, Jon's main idea remains: profanity is truly unnecessary
for discussing stamps.

Would you vote for more profanity on RCSD, Pedro?

Victor Manta

spam
 

I know that some children read them in the past. Anyway, even if it
doesn't happen often today, Jon's main idea remains: profanity is truly
unnecessary for discussing stamps.

Would you vote for more profanity on RCSD, Pedro?

Victor Manta


I was not talking about profanity, just asking if kids read newsgroups

Pedro Cabrera

spam
 

"Pedro" wrote in message
...
I know that some children read them in the past. Anyway, even if it
doesn't happen often today, Jon's main idea remains: profanity is truly
unnecessary for discussing stamps.
Would you vote for more profanity on RCSD, Pedro?

Victor Manta


I was not talking about profanity, just asking if kids read newsgroups

Pedro Cabrera

May I remind you the _whole_ context of your question (have to quote myself
for this):

" Which reminds me the wise words of Mr. Jon Bell, the author of the RCSD
charter: "Since the continuation of the hobby requires that we involve
children and make them interested and comfortable as collectors, profanity
is prohibited (and is truly unnecessary for discussing stamps)." "

--
Victor Manta

spam
 

"Victor Manta" wrote in message
...
"Pedro" wrote in message
...
I know that some children read them in the past. Anyway, even if it
doesn't happen often today, Jon's main idea remains: profanity is truly
unnecessary for discussing stamps.
Would you vote for more profanity on RCSD, Pedro?

Victor Manta


I was not talking about profanity, just asking if kids read newsgroups

Pedro Cabrera

May I remind you the _whole_ context of your question (have to quote
myself for this):

" Which reminds me the wise words of Mr. Jon Bell, the author of the RCSD
charter: "Since the continuation of the hobby requires that we involve
children and make them interested and comfortable as collectors, profanity
is prohibited (and is truly unnecessary for discussing stamps)." "

--
Victor Manta


I will quote your own answer to my question:

"I know that some children read them in the past. Anyway, even if it
doesn't happen often today, Jon's main idea remains: profanity is truly
unnecessary for discussing stamps."

and...in SUCH CONTEXT, the question:

"Would you vote for more profanity on RCSD, Pedro?"

is completeley irrelevant and unnecessary as I only asked about if children
do read NGs
I said nothing about profanity. IT WAS YOU. Perhaps it's a recurring thought
in you.
Remember always that when somebody has nothing more to say, it's better to
stay his mouth shut,
And not to behave like a child wanting always to say the last word

Bye,
Pedro